Do RESTFul web services create impact over the SOAP web services?

REST (Representation State Transfer) and SOAP (Simple Object Access Protocol) are the most popular of web services that are used by developers working with projects that are based on system integration. Software architects design applications from different perspectives colleague and will be able to decide the direction to take for exposing the API considering various reasons. So, let’s go ahead and discuss on when and where either of these is used and if RESTFul creates an impact over SOAP.

What are Web Services?

Web service is a software system that is designed to be a support for interactions between machines across the network. It is part of the overall Service Oriented Architecture and used as process decomposition and assembly model.

Web services are usually misunderstood for API; however, APIs (or Server-Side Web API) is a programmatic interface for the request response message system. It is generally expressed in XML or JSON and is then exposed through the web using the HTTP based server. Based on this one should get a general idea on when SOAP or REST is preferred over the other, but the actual truth isn’t that simple.

Now that we can agree to the fact that Web Services aren’t similar to Web APIs, it is now a good idea to understand why REST is used over SOAP.

REST easier than SOAP

It is common assumption that REST is easier to build and maintain than SOAP. Based on reality though, developing the REST services can get complex pretty quickly. Service abstractions, security requirements, asynchronous processes, and so on can easily add up and the level of complexity drastically increases.

Coming to the testing part, now again RESTFul web services is easier than the SOAP’s, but it’s only partially correct. For a basic REST service, testing is as simple as directing the browser towards its service endpoints and getting your required results. But, then you add all your required addons – HTTP headers, tokens, parameter validations, etc. – what happens? You can still test them, no issues, but then you may require plugins! And when plugins are required then the process becomes the same as testing the SOAP services.

JSON served by RESTFul is faster than XML served by SOAP

Another assumption, but this just focuses on JSON vs XML, which we wouldn’t want to discuss now and here. But then, it is the time we also consider, that RESTFul is a web service and can equally serve XML or other MIME. So, this comes down to the basic requirements.

Built for the Web – REST

Unlike the previous two factors, this is very much true. Roy Fielding credits his creation (REST style architecture) for using the web’s base technology to transport and communicate with the servers and the clients, which is unlike SOAP.

Since HTML5 we can also see that the web has become a platform of its own, apart from serving its initial requirements.

Catching some REST

When REST is used over HTTP, the catch feature of HTTP is utilized and therefore isn’t practical in dynamic websites. This is because, unlike static websites that are generated ones, the dynamic ones will require the constant update in its contents (such as in a “stock market” related website). With SOAP, on the other hand, you can build your own cache and not depend upon the protocol.


When there is a comparison between REST and SOAP, there is hardly any discussion about security. To put it simply REST uses the HTTP protocol for security (basic authentication and communication encryption, TLS). But, when it comes to security in SOAP, it provides a completely standardized WS-SECURITY setup. The HTTP isn’t reliable for its security and hence requires other protocols, in which case SOAP is much straightforward and simpler.


We do understand that there are a number of other factors that you can consider when comparing REST and SOAP, but, these factors are detrimental. REST developed for the web and evolves with it; however, its web services are most truly REST-like as opposed to following the architecture. With SOAP it is possible to bind it to HTTP and XML, and most apt for machine-to-machine communication. So, using of REST or SOAP web service ultimately comes down to one’s personal preferences and the requirements.